Quotes
Through the long years
I sought peace
I found ecstasy, I found anguish,
I found madness,
I found loneliness,
I found the solitary pain
that gnaws the heart,
But peace I did not find.
Now, old & near my end,
I have known you,
And, knowing you,
I have found both ecstasy & peace
I know rest
After so many lonely years.
I know what life & love may be.
Now, if I sleep
I shall sleep fulfilled.
Bertrand Russell, The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell 1872-1914, London, 1967
Only a radical change in human nature […] could overcome the tendency for people to find a way around any system that supresses private enterprise.
Peter Singer, Practical ethics, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 43-44
Another argument commonly used against aggregationism is also hard to understand (Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 27). This is the objection that utilitarianism “does not take seriously the distinction between persons”. To explain this objection: it is said that, if we claim that there is a duty to promote maximal preference satisfaction regardless of its distribution, we are treating a great interest of one as of less weight than the lesser interests of a great many, provided that the latter add up in aggregate to more than the former. For example, if I can save five patients moderate pain at the cost of not saving one patient severe pain, I should do so if the interests of the five in the relief of their pain is greater in aggregate than the interest of the one in the relief of his (or hers).
But to think in the way that utilitarians have to think about this kind of example is not to ignore the difference between persons. Why should anybody want to say this? Utilitarians are perfectly well aware that A, B and C in my example are different persons people. They are not blind. All they are doing is trying to do justice between the interests of these people. It is hard to see how else one could do this except by showing them all equal respect, and that, as we have seen, leads straight to aggregationism.
R. M. Hare, A utilitarian approach, in Helga Kuhse and Peter Singer (eds.) A companion to bioethics, Malden, MA, 2009, pp. 80–85, p. 83
The chief characteristic of the twentieth century is the terrible multiplication of the world’s population. It is a catastrophe, a disaster. We don’t know what to do about it.
Ernst Gombrich, quoted in Eric J. Hobsbawm, The age of extremes: a history of the world, 1914 - 1991, New York, 1994, p. 2
Sweet day! so cool, so calm, so bright,
The bridall of the earth and skie :
The dew shall weep thy fall to-night ;
For thou must die.
Sweet rose, whose hue angrie and brave
Bids the rash gazer wipe his eye:
Thy root is ever in its grave,
And thou must die.
Sweet spring! full of sweet days and roses,
A box where sweets compacted lie,
My musick shows ye have your closes,
And all must die.
Onely a sweet and vertuous soul,
Like season’d timber, never gives ;
But though the whole world turn to coal,
Then chiefly lives.
George Herbert, Vertue, 1663
El resultado del sistema gubernativo es, pues, exonerar a los pudientes y querientes de costear la educación de sus propios hijos haciendo que las rentas del Estado le economicen su propio dinero, mientras que el pobre que no educa a sus hijos paga por la educación de los hijos de los acomodados.
Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, Catedral al norte, Educación común, 1869
A vision on his sleep
There came, a dream of hopes that never yet
Had flushed his cheek. He dreamed a veiled maid
Sate near him, talking in low solemn tones.
Her voice was like the voice of his own soul
Heard in the calm of thought; its music long,
Like woven sounds of streams and breezes, held
His inmost sense suspended in its web
Of many-colored woof and shifting hues.
Knowledge and truth and virtue were her theme,
And lofty hopes of divine liberty,
Thoughts the most dear to him, and poesy,
Herself a poet. Soon the solemn mood
Of her pure mind kindled through all her frame
A permeating fire; wild numbers then
She raised, with voice stifled in tremulous sobs
Subdued by its own pathos; her fair hands
Were bare alone, sweeping from some strange harp
Strange symphony, and in their branching veins
The eloquent blood told an ineffable tale.
The beating of her heart was heard to fill
The pauses of her music, and her breath
Tumultuously accorded with those fits
Of intermitted song. Sudden she rose,
As if her heart impatiently endured
Its bursting burden; at the sound he turned,
And saw by the warm light of their own life
Her glowing limbs beneath the sinuous veil
Of woven wind, her outspread arms now bare,
Her dark locks floating in the breath of night,
Her beamy bending eyes, her parted lips
Outstretched, and pale, and quivering eagerly.
His strong heart sunk and sickened with excess
Of love. He reared his shuddering limbs, and quelled
His gasping breath, and spread his arms to meet
Her panting bosom:–she drew back awhile,
Then, yielding to the irresistible joy,
With frantic gesture and short breathless cry
Folded his frame in her dissolving arms.
Now blackness veiled his dizzy eyes, and night
Involved and swallowed up the vision; sleep,
Like a dark flood suspended in its course,
Rolled back its impulse on his vacant brain.
Percy Bysshe Shelley, Alastor; or, The Spirit of Solitude: and Other Poems, London, 1816, pp. 149-191
This is servitude,
To serve th’ unwise, or him who hath rebelld
Against his worthier, as thine now serve thee,
Thy self not free, but to thy self enthrall’d;
John Milton and John Leonard, Paradise lost, London, 2003
It would, indeed, not be very wide of the mark to argue that much of what had been achieved by the art of education in the nineteenth century had been frustrated by the art of propaganda in the twentieth.
Harold Joseph Laski, A grammar of politics, London, 1925, p. 4
[P]ower is power over human beings. Over the body but, above all, over the mind. Power over matter—external reality, as you would call it—is not important. Already our control over matter is absolute.
George Orwell, Nineteen eighty-four, London, 1949
Dream not that men will move their little finger to serve you, unless their advantage in so doing be obvious to them. Men never did so, and never will, while human nature is made of its present materials.
Jeremy Bentham, The works of Jeremy Bentham, Edinburgh, 1838, p. 132
“Growth” is a funny sort of concept. For example, our GNP increases every time we build a prison. Well, okay, it’s growth in a sense, but it’s kind of a dumb measure. Has our life improved if we have more people in prison?
Noam Chomsky, Interview with Jerry Brown, SPIN Magazine, 1993
Ein verheirateter Philosoph gehört in die Komödie.
Friedrich Nietzsche, Zur Genealogie der Moral: eine Streitschrift, Stuttgart, 1887
What peculiar privilege has this little agitation of the brain which we call thought, that we must thus make it the model of the wole universe?
David Hume and J. M. Bell, Dialogues concerning natural religion, London ; New York, 1779
It is almost as if the human brain were specifically designed to misunderstand Darwinism, and to find it hard to believe.
Richard Dawkins, The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design, New York, 1986, p. xv
Omnis definitio est periculosa. Certain writers make such a point of repeating the statement, “It is dangerous to define,” that at times one wonders whether defining might not be especially dangerous for their own thinking.
Giovanni Sartori, Democratic theory, Westport, Conn, 1962, p. 6
[E]volution does not give us a best of all possible worlds.
D. C. Dennett, The intentional stance, Cambridge, Mass., 1987, p. 50
Probability is the guide of life, and of death, too.
Peter Singer, Practical ethics, Cambridge, 1993, p. 197
ANGELO I will not do’t.
ISABELLA But can you, if you would?
ANGELO Look, what I will not, that I cannot do.
William Shakespeare, Measure for Measure, London, 1623
Preguntadle a un inglés: ¿cuál es la raza humana más perfecta? La sajona, responderá imperturbablemente. Haced la misma pregunta a un francés o a un italiano, y os contestará: la latina. Si interrogáis a un chino, sus compatriotas constituyen la raza más perfecta y el pueblo más avanzado de la tierra; a los europeos llámanlos con desprecio los bárbaros de Occidente. Así, si nosotros preguntáramos: ¿cuál de los diferentes grupos de mamíferos puede considerarse el más perfecto y cuál de ellos tiene derecho a figurar a la cabeza del reino animal? El hombre, nos contestarían unánimes. Nuestro voto formaría una nota discordante en medio del concordante coro.
Quizá si pudiéramos hacer la misma pregunta a un elefante, a un león o a un caballo y ellos pudieran contestarnos, tendríamos una segunda edición de las contestaciones del inglés, el francés, el chino y el italiano; pero como esto no es posible, vamos a reemplazarlos, figurándonos por momentos que somos un proboscídeo que va a examinar el raro bípedo o un león que contempla una media docena de víctimas distintas para hacerse una idea de la presa de más alto precio.
Florentino Ameghino, Filogenia, Buenos Aires, 1884, pp. 115-116