<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Queerness · Pablo Stafforini</title><link>https://stafforini.com/tags/queerness/</link><description/><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stafforini.com/tags/queerness/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ethics</title><link>https://stafforini.com/quotes/wittgenstein-ethics/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stafforini.com/quotes/wittgenstein-ethics/</guid><description>&lt;![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And now I must say that if I contemplate what Ethics really would have to be if there were such a science, this result seems to me quite obvious. It seems to me obvious that nothing we could ever think or say should be /the /thing. That we cannot write a scientific book, the subject matter of which could be intrinsically sublime and above all other subject matters. I can only describe my feeling by the metaphor, that, if a man could write a book on Ethics which really was a book on Ethics, this book would, with an explosion, destroy all the other books in the world.</p></blockquote>
]]></description></item></channel></rss>