<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Scientism · Pablo Stafforini</title><link>https://stafforini.com/tags/scientism/</link><description/><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stafforini.com/tags/scientism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>consciousness</title><link>https://stafforini.com/quotes/lockwood-consciousness/</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stafforini.com/quotes/lockwood-consciousness/</guid><description>&lt;![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“[N]o-nonsense” materialism […] is characterized not so much by what it asserts, namely the identity of conscious states and processes with certain physiological states and processes, but by an accompanying failure to appreciate that there is anything philosophically problematic about such an identification.</p></blockquote>
]]></description></item><item><title>anti-science</title><link>https://stafforini.com/quotes/ladyman-anti-science/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stafforini.com/quotes/ladyman-anti-science/</guid><description>&lt;![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of all the main historical positions in philosophy, the logical positivists and logical empiricists came closest to the insights we have urged. Over-reactions to their errors have led metaphysicians over the past few decades into widespread unscientific and even anti-scientific intellectual waters. We urge them to come back and rejoin the great epistemic enterprise of modern civilization.</p></blockquote>
]]></description></item></channel></rss>