Values, God, and the problem about why there is anything at all

Abstract

The universe is characterized by objective values that inform reality, moving from potentiality to instantiation. Traditional theistic and dialectical frameworks often fail to address the radical problem of why something exists rather than nothing, as they frequently assume an existing ground for explanation. If values possess creative power, they provide a terminal explanation that avoids the infinite regress typically found in factual causal chains. While critiques predicated on scientific naturalism challenge the objectivity of value, the minimal order required for rational discourse suggests an underlying axiological principle. Three distinct metaphysical models bridge the gap between value and existence. The principle of defining boundaries posits values as the determinants of the metaphysical subject’s limits, influencing the world without appearing as objects within it. The principle of individuating teleology suggests that values distinguish genuine existents from mere entities by providing specific developmental aims. Finally, the principle of biased probabilities maintains that a non-random universe requires an original conceptual valuation to prioritize structure over chaotic equilibrium. These models collectively suggest that values and existence are inextricably linked through a principle of plenitude, where the struggle for value instantiation provides a coherent account of the universe’s overall structure and direction. – AI-generated abstract.