works
Paul Avrich Anarchist portraits book Anarchism functioned as a primary ideological current within the global revolutionary movements of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, presenting a fundamental critique of both the capitalist state and centralized Marxism. Thinkers such as Mikhail Bakunin and Peter Kropotkin developed a philosophy of immediate social revolution based on spontaneous mass action and the principle of mutual aid, rejecting the transition through a dictatorial “new class” of state administrators. These theoretical frameworks translated into practical efforts across diverse geographical regions, including the peasant insurrection led by Nestor Makhno in Ukraine and the robust immigrant-led organizations in the United States, notably among Jewish and Italian labor circles. The movement was characterized by an emphasis on individual sovereignty, decentralized communal organization, and the belief that the means used to achieve revolution must embody the libertarian ends sought. Despite systematic suppression by both liberal democracies and Bolshevik regimes, the anarchist tradition established a framework for workers’ self-management, secular education, and cooperative production. These historical case studies demonstrate that the consistent core of anarchism was an opposition to the concentration of power and a warning that state socialism would eventually evolve into a new form of administrative slavery. By examining these biographies and their associated movements, the persistence of anti-authoritarianism as a counterculture to the modern bureaucratic state becomes evident. – AI-generated abstract.

Anarchist portraits

Paul Avrich

Princeton, NJ, 1988

Abstract

Anarchism functioned as a primary ideological current within the global revolutionary movements of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, presenting a fundamental critique of both the capitalist state and centralized Marxism. Thinkers such as Mikhail Bakunin and Peter Kropotkin developed a philosophy of immediate social revolution based on spontaneous mass action and the principle of mutual aid, rejecting the transition through a dictatorial “new class” of state administrators. These theoretical frameworks translated into practical efforts across diverse geographical regions, including the peasant insurrection led by Nestor Makhno in Ukraine and the robust immigrant-led organizations in the United States, notably among Jewish and Italian labor circles. The movement was characterized by an emphasis on individual sovereignty, decentralized communal organization, and the belief that the means used to achieve revolution must embody the libertarian ends sought. Despite systematic suppression by both liberal democracies and Bolshevik regimes, the anarchist tradition established a framework for workers’ self-management, secular education, and cooperative production. These historical case studies demonstrate that the consistent core of anarchism was an opposition to the concentration of power and a warning that state socialism would eventually evolve into a new form of administrative slavery. By examining these biographies and their associated movements, the persistence of anti-authoritarianism as a counterculture to the modern bureaucratic state becomes evident. – AI-generated abstract.

PDF

First page of PDF