There might be nothing
Analysis, vol. 56, no. 4, 1996, pp. 231–238
Abstract
Is it a necessary truth that there is something or other? In recent papers van Inwagen and Lowe argue that it is impossible, or vanishingly improbable, for there to be nothing at all. I defend the contrary nihilist hypothesis by a subtraction argument and use the resulting position to criticize the arguments of van Inwagen and Lowe.
