Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy
Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 30, no. 3, 2001, pp. 257–296
Abstract
Blake argues that a globally impartial liberal theory is not incompatible with distinct principles of distributive justice applicable only within the national context. A concern with relative economic shares, he argues, is a plausible interpretation of liberal principles only when those principles are applied to individuals who share liability to the coercive network of state governance.
