A framework for self-determination

Abstract

A more robust recognition of a right to self-determination in international law and foreign policy is needed. While territorial integrity has been prioritized, this principle is not supported by strong philosophical arguments, and it has arguably led to greater conflict and suffering. Five principles—popular will, possession, governance, law, and territorial sanity—should be considered when evaluating self-determination efforts. Applying these principles to the cases of Artsakh, Crimea, and Taiwan reveals a need for changes in their internationally recognized status, with popular will generally serving as a necessary condition for justifying such changes. – AI-generated abstract.