The simulation argument: reply to Weatherson
The philosophical quarterly, vol. 55, no. 218, 2005, pp. 90–97
Abstract
I reply to some recent comments by Brian Weatherson on my ‘simulation argument’. I clarify some interpretational matters, and address issues relating to epistemological externalism, the difference from traditional brain‐in‐a‐vat arguments, and a challenge based on grue’‐like predicates.
