No argument against the continuity of value: reply to Dorsey
Utilitas, vol. 22, no. 4, 2010, pp. 494–496
Abstract
Dorsey rejects Conclusion, so he believes he must reject one of the premises. He argues that the best option is to reject Premise 3. Rejecting Premise 3 entails a certain sort of discontinuity in value. So Dorsey believes he has an argument for discontinuity.
