works
Malcolm W. Browne Nuclear winter theorists pull back article Many scientists have disputed the extent to which a nuclear war could cause a severe global chilling or ’nuclear winter,’ which could have catastrophic consequences for human survival. The five scientists who coined the term ’nuclear winter’ have recently revised their earlier estimates of the severity of such an event, suggesting that the temperature drop would likely be less pronounced than previously predicted. Nevertheless, the potential atmospheric impacts of a nuclear war remain a subject of scientific debate, with uncertainties in factors such as the amount of combustible material available for burning, the timing of the conflict, the atmospheric dynamics of smoke and dust, and the darkness caused by soot from fires. – AI-generated abstract.

Nuclear winter theorists pull back

Malcolm W. Browne

The New York Times, 1990

Abstract

Many scientists have disputed the extent to which a nuclear war could cause a severe global chilling or ’nuclear winter,’ which could have catastrophic consequences for human survival. The five scientists who coined the term ’nuclear winter’ have recently revised their earlier estimates of the severity of such an event, suggesting that the temperature drop would likely be less pronounced than previously predicted. Nevertheless, the potential atmospheric impacts of a nuclear war remain a subject of scientific debate, with uncertainties in factors such as the amount of combustible material available for burning, the timing of the conflict, the atmospheric dynamics of smoke and dust, and the darkness caused by soot from fires. – AI-generated abstract.

PDF

First page of PDF