Evaluating philosophies

Abstract

Proposes and illustrates a simple criterion for evaluating any philosophical doctrine: Does it help advance knowledge? Clearly written, and avoids the use of obscure technical terms Argues for an emergentist and non-reductionist view of materialism, as well as for a non-posivist version of scientism, and a systemic alternative to both individualism and holism. ​ Philosophies, whether genuine or spurious, are not usually adopted because of their conceptual, empirical, or moral merits, but because of tradition, political interests, or even temperament–none of which is a good reason. The present book argues for a precise criterion: A philosophy is worth what it helps learn, act, conserve our common heritage, and get along with fellow humans.