The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies
Princeton, 2007
Abstract
Voters are systematically irrational, and this irrationality has profound effects on policy. The public underestimates the benefits of markets, of dealing with foreigners, of conserving labor, and of past and future economic performance. Economists and the public disagree widely about economic policy, and this gap is primarily driven by systematic errors in the public’s thinking. This book argues that voters are irrational not because they are ignorant, but because they prioritize their psychological well-being over their material well-being. Because their votes are unlikely to change the outcome of an election, voters face no material cost for indulging their false beliefs. Politicians, for their part, are not primarily driven by self-interest, but by the desire to win elections by conforming to voter preferences. They therefore have little incentive to correct popular errors. The result is that democracies make a lot of bad decisions, driven by the public’s persistent misconceptions. – AI-generated abstract
Quotes from this work
Nearly all modern economic theories of politics begin by assuming that the typical citizen understands economics and votes accordingly—at least on average. […] In stark contrast, introductory economics courses still tacitly assume that students arrive with biased beliefs, and try to set them straight, leading to better policy. […]
What a striking situation: As researchers, economists do not mention systematically biased economic beliefs; as teachers, they take their existence for granted.