works
Joseph Carlsmith Simulation arguments online There is strong evidence that increasing tobacco taxation reduces tobacco consumption and improves health outcomes. Studies show that government implementation of tobacco taxation is highly cost-effective. Lobbying low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to increase tobacco taxes could be a highly effective intervention, but there is a lack of research on key lobbying-related factors, such as success rates and time frames. A possible implementation plan involves hiring local lobbyists and tobacco control experts to implement legislation at the national level, with a focus on LMICs where tobacco control efforts are lacking and political will may exist. However, there are concerns about the difficulty of testing and evaluating lobbying efforts, the risk of legal challenges from tobacco companies, and the need for specialized skills that limit flexibility. – AI-generated abstract.

Simulation arguments

Joseph Carlsmith

Hands and Cities, February 18, 2022

Abstract

There is strong evidence that increasing tobacco taxation reduces tobacco consumption and improves health outcomes. Studies show that government implementation of tobacco taxation is highly cost-effective. Lobbying low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to increase tobacco taxes could be a highly effective intervention, but there is a lack of research on key lobbying-related factors, such as success rates and time frames. A possible implementation plan involves hiring local lobbyists and tobacco control experts to implement legislation at the national level, with a focus on LMICs where tobacco control efforts are lacking and political will may exist. However, there are concerns about the difficulty of testing and evaluating lobbying efforts, the risk of legal challenges from tobacco companies, and the need for specialized skills that limit flexibility. – AI-generated abstract.

PDF

First page of PDF