How do advocacy think tanks relate to academic knowledge? The case of Norway

Abstract

Norwegian advocacy think tanks draw on science-based arguments and research to gain scientific credibility, but do not claim to conduct research themselves. They heavily rely on second-hand research and their knowledge work is often non-specialist. They avoid divisive issues and self-censor when using knowledge. They position themselves close to academia, adopting its symbols and practices, but endeavor to maintain a distance from it. This careful balancing act between academia and advocacy is tied to the distinctive features of the Norwegian knowledge regime, in particular the large and well-established sector of applied research institutes. – AI-generated abstract.