A farewell to alms: A brief economic history of the world
Princeton, 2007
Abstract
Introduction : the sixteen-page economic history of the world – The logic of the Malthusian economy – Material living standards – Fertility – Life expectancy – Malthus and Darwin : survival of the richest – Technological advance – Institutions and growth – The emergence of modern man – Modern growth : the wealth of nations – The puzzle of the industrial revolution – The industrial revolution in England – Why England? Why not China, Japan or India? – Social consequences – World growth since 1800 – The proximate sources of divergence – Why isn’t the whole world developed? – Conclusion : strange new world
Quotes from this work
In Guns, Germs, and Steel Jared Diamond suggested that geography, botany, and zoology were destiny. Europe and Asia pressed ahead economically, and remained ahead to the present day, because of accidents of geography. They had the kinds of animals that could be domesticated, and the orientation of the Eurasian land mass allowed domesticated plants and animals to spread easily between societies. But there is a gaping lacuna in his argument. In a modern world in which the path to riches lies through industrialization, why are bad-tempered zebras and hippos the barrier to economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa? Why didn’t the Industrial Revolution free Africa, New Guinea, and South America from their old geographic disadvantages, rather than accentuate their backwardness? And why did the takeover of Australia by the British propel a part of the world that had not developed settled agriculture by 1800 into the first rank among developed economies?
Since we are for the most part the descendants of the strivers of the pre-industrial world, those driven to achieve greater economic success than their peers, perhaps these findings reflect another cultural or biological heritage from the Malthusian era. The contented may well have lost out in the Darwinian struggle that defined the world before 1800. Those who were successful in the economy of the Malthusian era could well have been driven by a need to have more than their peers in order to be happy. Modern man might not be designed for contentment. The envious have inherited the earth.