works
R. M. Hare Could Kant have been a utilitarian? incollection My aim in this paper is to ask a question, not to answer it. To answer it with confidence would require more concentrated study of Kant’s text than I have yet had time for. I have read his main ethical works, and formed some tentative conclusions which I shall diffidently state. I have also read some of his Englishspeaking disciples and would-be disciples, but not, I must admit, any of his German expositors except Leonard Nelson. My purpose in raising the question is to enlist the help of others in answering it.

Could Kant have been a utilitarian?

R. M. Hare

In R. M. Dancy (ed.) Kant and Critique: New Essays in Honor of W.H. Werkmeister, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 91–113

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to ask a question, not to answer it. To answer it with confidence would require more concentrated study of Kant’s text than I have yet had time for. I have read his main ethical works, and formed some tentative conclusions which I shall diffidently state. I have also read some of his Englishspeaking disciples and would-be disciples, but not, I must admit, any of his German expositors except Leonard Nelson. My purpose in raising the question is to enlist the help of others in answering it.