works
William Hasker The necessity of gratuitous evil article It is widely accepted that a morally perfect God would prevent all “gratuitous evil”, evil which is necessary for some greater good. I argue that this requirement is unsound–that “if God necessarily prevents gratuitous evil, morality is undermined”. Objections by William Rowe complicate the discussion of this claim but do not refute it. In conclusion, a parallel argument concerning natural evil is presented.

The necessity of gratuitous evil

William Hasker

Faith and Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 1, 1992, pp. 23–44

Abstract

It is widely accepted that a morally perfect God would prevent all “gratuitous evil”, evil which is necessary for some greater good. I argue that this requirement is unsound–that “if God necessarily prevents gratuitous evil, morality is undermined”. Objections by William Rowe complicate the discussion of this claim but do not refute it. In conclusion, a parallel argument concerning natural evil is presented.

PDF

First page of PDF