Decision-theoretic consequentialism and the nearest and dearest objection

Abstract

Decision-theoretic consequentialism is a plausible ethical theory that can justify agents displaying moral favoritism towards smaller groups of people, such as their friends and family. This justification is probabilistic in nature: living ethically involves focusing on actions that will likely lead to good outcomes, and because of epistemic limitations, people are better able to predict the outcomes of their actions when those actions impact smaller, more familiar groups. This theory also emphasizes the importance of considering the agent’s character and values when making moral decisions, as these factors can affect the likelihood of achieving good outcomes. Ultimately, decision-theoretic consequentialism offers a coherent explanation for why people can live moral lives focused on the well-being of a small group of people without compromising their commitment to maximizing overall good. – AI-generated abstract