works
José Ferrater Mora The intellectual in contemporary society article The relationship between the intellectual and contemporary society is defined by a reciprocal tension between social necessity and institutional hostility. Unlike historical precedents such as the Socratic or Renaissance periods, the modern intellectual operates within a universal crisis characterized by a highly organized yet directionless social structure. Intellectual activity is distinguished by its pursuit of ends independent of immediate social demands, a characteristic that society often views with suspicion. Three primary responses to this tension—understanding, justification, and transformation—frequently collapse into forms of passivity or conformity to present or future social orders. To preserve essential values of freedom and objectivity, the intellectual must navigate a non-reductive path between total adaptation and sterile rebellion. This requires a pragmatic integration of ethics and policy, where the choice between survival and resistance is dictated by the specific interaction of ideas and reality at a given moment. Ultimately, the intellectual’s role is to maintain the dialectical contact between thought and social existence, ensuring that means and ends remain mutually operative without succumbing to metaphysical absolutes or social subservience. – AI-generated abstract.

The intellectual in contemporary society

José Ferrater Mora

Ethics, vol. 69, no. 2, 1959, pp. 94–101

Abstract

The relationship between the intellectual and contemporary society is defined by a reciprocal tension between social necessity and institutional hostility. Unlike historical precedents such as the Socratic or Renaissance periods, the modern intellectual operates within a universal crisis characterized by a highly organized yet directionless social structure. Intellectual activity is distinguished by its pursuit of ends independent of immediate social demands, a characteristic that society often views with suspicion. Three primary responses to this tension—understanding, justification, and transformation—frequently collapse into forms of passivity or conformity to present or future social orders. To preserve essential values of freedom and objectivity, the intellectual must navigate a non-reductive path between total adaptation and sterile rebellion. This requires a pragmatic integration of ethics and policy, where the choice between survival and resistance is dictated by the specific interaction of ideas and reality at a given moment. Ultimately, the intellectual’s role is to maintain the dialectical contact between thought and social existence, ensuring that means and ends remain mutually operative without succumbing to metaphysical absolutes or social subservience. – AI-generated abstract.

PDF

First page of PDF