works
Thomas Nagel The Problem of global justice article Justice on a global scale remains a complex challenge due to the conceptual link between sovereign authority and the demands of equality. While universal humanitarian duties necessitate the relief of extreme suffering and the protection of basic rights, socioeconomic justice functions as a specifically political value arising from membership in a shared state. Under this political conception, the requirements of distributive justice are associative obligations triggered by participation in a coercively imposed legal framework where citizens act as both subjects and putative joint authors. In the absence of global sovereignty, international relations are governed by bargaining and humanitarian concern rather than the egalitarian standards applicable within nation-states. Current global institutions fail to trigger these standards because they lack the direct authorization of individuals and do not exercise sovereign power in the name of a global citizenry. Historically, political power and sovereignty have preceded the development of legitimacy and justice. Therefore, the eventual realization of global justice likely depends on the creation of effective, though initially illegitimate, supranational structures that provide the necessary institutional foundation for future demands for democratic accountability and social fairness. – AI-generated abstract.

The Problem of global justice

Thomas Nagel

Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 33, no. 2, 2005, pp. 113–147

Abstract

Justice on a global scale remains a complex challenge due to the conceptual link between sovereign authority and the demands of equality. While universal humanitarian duties necessitate the relief of extreme suffering and the protection of basic rights, socioeconomic justice functions as a specifically political value arising from membership in a shared state. Under this political conception, the requirements of distributive justice are associative obligations triggered by participation in a coercively imposed legal framework where citizens act as both subjects and putative joint authors. In the absence of global sovereignty, international relations are governed by bargaining and humanitarian concern rather than the egalitarian standards applicable within nation-states. Current global institutions fail to trigger these standards because they lack the direct authorization of individuals and do not exercise sovereign power in the name of a global citizenry. Historically, political power and sovereignty have preceded the development of legitimacy and justice. Therefore, the eventual realization of global justice likely depends on the creation of effective, though initially illegitimate, supranational structures that provide the necessary institutional foundation for future demands for democratic accountability and social fairness. – AI-generated abstract.

PDF

First page of PDF