works
Ulric Neisser et al. Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns article Intelligence encompasses diverse abilities to comprehend complex ideas, adapt to environments, and learn from experience. Psychometric measures of intelligence demonstrate significant stability over time and serve as moderate predictors of academic achievement, occupational status, and social outcomes. While genetic factors contribute substantially to individual differences in adulthood, the specific biological pathways remain unidentified. Simultaneously, environmental influences, particularly formal schooling and unique individual life experiences, play a critical role in cognitive development. This is exemplified by the Flynn effect, which documents a steady, worldwide rise in average test scores over several decades. Significant mean differences in test performance observed between various ethnic groups cannot be attributed to simple test bias or socioeconomic status alone, yet there is no empirical evidence to support a genetic basis for these disparities. Instead, these gaps likely reflect complex interactions involving cultural values, caste-like social structures, and historical disadvantages. Despite the robust findings within the psychometric tradition, many questions regarding the mechanisms of gene-environment interaction and the nature of non-traditional intellectual domains, such as practical and creative intelligence, remain unresolved. – AI-generated abstract.

Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns

Ulric Neisser et al.

American Psychologist, vol. 51, no. 2, 1996, pp. 77–101

Abstract

Intelligence encompasses diverse abilities to comprehend complex ideas, adapt to environments, and learn from experience. Psychometric measures of intelligence demonstrate significant stability over time and serve as moderate predictors of academic achievement, occupational status, and social outcomes. While genetic factors contribute substantially to individual differences in adulthood, the specific biological pathways remain unidentified. Simultaneously, environmental influences, particularly formal schooling and unique individual life experiences, play a critical role in cognitive development. This is exemplified by the Flynn effect, which documents a steady, worldwide rise in average test scores over several decades. Significant mean differences in test performance observed between various ethnic groups cannot be attributed to simple test bias or socioeconomic status alone, yet there is no empirical evidence to support a genetic basis for these disparities. Instead, these gaps likely reflect complex interactions involving cultural values, caste-like social structures, and historical disadvantages. Despite the robust findings within the psychometric tradition, many questions regarding the mechanisms of gene-environment interaction and the nature of non-traditional intellectual domains, such as practical and creative intelligence, remain unresolved. – AI-generated abstract.

PDF

First page of PDF