Why we should be wary of an aggressive government response to coronavirus

Abstract

The article discusses the potential downsides of an aggressive government response to a viral outbreak, such as the coronavirus. It argues that such measures are unlikely to be effective, and may lead to discrimination against marginalized populations and intensify public panic. The article uses historical examples such as the bubonic plague and the Ebola outbreak to illustrate how fear-driven public health policies can exacerbate the problem. It also examines the potential dangers of the new CDC quarantine regulations, which it believes could allow for the arbitrary detention of individuals. The article advocates for a strong and accessible health-care system, as well as trust in public health officials, as the best ways to address a health crisis. – AI-generated abstract