The a priori
In Frank Jackson and Michael Smith (eds.) The oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy, Oxford, 2007, pp. 739–763
Abstract
The existence and nature of the a priori constitute a foundational concern within philosophical inquiry, serving as a primary determinant for broader methodological approaches. Philosophical frameworks, ranging from Kantian critical philosophy to Quinean epistemology, are fundamentally shaped by their treatment of a priori versus empirical knowledge. These commitments extend beyond explicit theoretical debates, influencing a practitioner’s conception of justification, the scope of valid evidence, and the ultimate objectives of the discipline. Even in instances where the concept remains implicit, the structural underpinnings of philosophical investigation—specifically the standards for rational validation—are inextricably linked to underlying assumptions regarding non-empirical warrant. Consequently, the study of the a priori is not merely a specialized subfield but a critical element in defining the limits and character of contemporary epistemology and the philosophy of language. Understanding the nature of the a priori is therefore essential for evaluating the range of considerations to which a philosopher is open and the specific goals assigned to the subject. – AI-generated abstract.
