works
Philip Pettit Two sources of morality article Where in human experience are moral terms or concepts grounded; where in experience does the moral becomes salient to us? The question calls for a naturalistic genealogy, so far as we are not possessed of an irreducibly moral sense whereby irreducibly moral properties might be revealed to us. I argue that intentional subjects need not have any normative concepts whatsoever but that creatures who are discursive do. They will have to access inferentially normative concepts so far as they reason together and there are two separate ways in which they will be disposed to register moral considerations. The first involves them privileging discourse as a form of interaction and the second involves them extending such discourse to the realm of sentiment. Privileging discourse and discursifying sentiment are the two distinct sources of moral conceptualization that are signaled in the title of the paper, and a brief conclusion suggests that the different concepts they provide represent rival attractors–respectively deontological and teleological–in the construction of moral theory.

Two sources of morality

Philip Pettit

Social philosophy & policy, vol. 18, no. 2, 2001, pp. 102–128

Abstract

Where in human experience are moral terms or concepts grounded; where in experience does the moral becomes salient to us? The question calls for a naturalistic genealogy, so far as we are not possessed of an irreducibly moral sense whereby irreducibly moral properties might be revealed to us. I argue that intentional subjects need not have any normative concepts whatsoever but that creatures who are discursive do. They will have to access inferentially normative concepts so far as they reason together and there are two separate ways in which they will be disposed to register moral considerations. The first involves them privileging discourse as a form of interaction and the second involves them extending such discourse to the realm of sentiment. Privileging discourse and discursifying sentiment are the two distinct sources of moral conceptualization that are signaled in the title of the paper, and a brief conclusion suggests that the different concepts they provide represent rival attractors–respectively deontological and teleological–in the construction of moral theory.

PDF

First page of PDF