works
Stuart Rachels Is unpleasantness intrinsic to unpleasant experiences? article Unpleasant experiences include backaches, moments of nausea, moments of nervousness, phantom pains, and so on. What does their unpleasantness consist in? The unpleasantness of an experience has been thought to consist in: (1) its representing bodily damage; (2) its inclining the subject to fight its continuation; (3) the subject’s disliking it; (4) features intrinsic to it. I offer compelling objections to (1) and (2) and less compelling objections to (3). I defend (4) against five challenging objections and offer two reasons to believe it. Hence, I advocate “intrinsic nature,” the idea that unpleasantness is intrinsic to unpleasant experiences.

Is unpleasantness intrinsic to unpleasant experiences?

Stuart Rachels

Philosophical studies, vol. 99, no. 2, 2000, pp. 187–210

Abstract

Unpleasant experiences include backaches, moments of nausea, moments of nervousness, phantom pains, and so on. What does their unpleasantness consist in? The unpleasantness of an experience has been thought to consist in: (1) its representing bodily damage; (2) its inclining the subject to fight its continuation; (3) the subject’s disliking it; (4) features intrinsic to it. I offer compelling objections to (1) and (2) and less compelling objections to (3). I defend (4) against five challenging objections and offer two reasons to believe it. Hence, I advocate “intrinsic nature,” the idea that unpleasantness is intrinsic to unpleasant experiences.

PDF

First page of PDF