works
David W. Shoemaker Disintegrated persons and distributive principles article In this paper I consider Derek Parfit’s attempt to respond to Rawls’s charge that utilitarianism ignores the distinction between persons. I proceed by arguing that there is a moderate form of reductionism about persons, one stressing the importance of what Parfit calls psychological connectedness, which can hold in different degrees both within one person and between distinct persons.

Disintegrated persons and distributive principles

David W. Shoemaker

Ratio, vol. 15, no. 1, 2002, pp. 58–79

Abstract

In this paper I consider Derek Parfit’s attempt to respond to Rawls’s charge that utilitarianism ignores the distinction between persons. I proceed by arguing that there is a moderate form of reductionism about persons, one stressing the importance of what Parfit calls psychological connectedness, which can hold in different degrees both within one person and between distinct persons.

PDF

First page of PDF