works
Peter Wildeford Can we apply start-up investing principles to non-profits? online This essay investigates the efficacy of applying start-up investing principles to non-profit organizations. It delves into two main strategies – “hits-based giving” and the “start-up approach.” Hits-based giving, inspired by venture capital practices, suggests donating to multiple charities, knowing some may fail, but those that succeed will yield high altruistic returns. On the other hand, the start-up approach encourages evaluating non-profits using business metrics like product quality, market size, growth rate, and team competence. The piece also explores the similarities and differences between for-profit and non-profit investing, identifying key distinctions like value arbitrage and risk tolerance. It further suggests an ‘incubation approach,’ where information collected through systematic evaluation and transparent grant making can guide philanthropic decisions. However, it acknowledges the inherent challenge in identifying and evaluating non-profits with long-term payoffs successfully. It concludes by advocating for more exploration and scale-up of the incubation process across various cause areas. – AI-generated abstract.

Can we apply start-up investing principles to non-profits?

Peter Wildeford

Effective Altruism Forum, June 27, 2017

Abstract

This essay investigates the efficacy of applying start-up investing principles to non-profit organizations. It delves into two main strategies – “hits-based giving” and the “start-up approach.” Hits-based giving, inspired by venture capital practices, suggests donating to multiple charities, knowing some may fail, but those that succeed will yield high altruistic returns. On the other hand, the start-up approach encourages evaluating non-profits using business metrics like product quality, market size, growth rate, and team competence. The piece also explores the similarities and differences between for-profit and non-profit investing, identifying key distinctions like value arbitrage and risk tolerance. It further suggests an ‘incubation approach,’ where information collected through systematic evaluation and transparent grant making can guide philanthropic decisions. However, it acknowledges the inherent challenge in identifying and evaluating non-profits with long-term payoffs successfully. It concludes by advocating for more exploration and scale-up of the incubation process across various cause areas. – AI-generated abstract.

PDF

First page of PDF